Tag: Newly Qualified Healthcare Professionals

  • When Should I Escalate a Concern as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional?

    When Should I Escalate a Concern as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional?

    Something has changed.

    You are not sure whether it is significant.

    Nothing is obviously an emergency, but you are uncomfortable carrying on as though everything is normal.

    Then comes the question:

    Do I need to escalate this?

    Escalation is not simply about how worried you feel. It is a judgement about risk, responsibility and whether the situation now requires somebody else to know, review, decide or act.

    In brief

    You do not need to know exactly what is wrong before escalating a concern.

    Escalation becomes more likely when:

    • the person is deteriorating or behaving differently from expected;
    • you identify a clinical or professional warning sign that, within your role, requires further review or escalation;
    • risk appears to be increasing;
    • you cannot safely evaluate what is happening;
    • your plan depends on a decision outside your competence or scope of practice;
    • continuing could expose someone to avoidable harm;
    • you have acted within your role but the concern remains unresolved; or
    • a professional, legal or organisational requirement means the concern should be escalated or reported.

    What counts as a warning sign differs between professions, settings and patient groups. You still need to act on the clinical, safeguarding and other escalation indicators relevant to your scope and local procedures.

    A useful question is:

    Does somebody else now need to know, review, decide or act?

    Navigating the parts of healthcare practice nobody quite explains?

    Core & Oak provides practical articles and resources on professional judgement, communication, uncertainty and career development.

    Join the Core & Oak mailing list for new articles and practical resources.

    How do I know when to escalate a concern?

    It helps to distinguish three situations.

    Asking for advice: 

    You can still manage the situation within your role, but another perspective would help.

    Escalating a concern: 

    The risk, uncertainty or responsibility means another person now needs to become involved.

    Urgent escalation: 

    The potential risk means somebody else needs to be involved immediately through the appropriate local process.

    The difference is not how confident you sound.

    It is what the situation requires.

    Infographic comparing asking for advice, escalation and urgent escalation in healthcare practice.

    If organising your thoughts before approaching somebody is difficult, How to Ask for Help Without Feeling Incompetent → explores how to make that request clearly.

    Do I need to know what is wrong before escalating?

    No.

    Your responsibility may be to recognise that something has changed, assess the situation appropriately within your role, and decide what that information means for what should happen next.

    Imagine a newly qualified physiotherapist mobilising a patient after surgery. Yesterday the patient walked safely with supervision. Today they become unusually breathless after only a short distance and say they feel “not quite right”.

    The physiotherapist stops the activity and makes sure the patient is safe.

    They then gather the information that is appropriate within their role. Depending on the situation, that might include clarifying the patient’s symptoms, observing their presentation, completing the relevant elements of their usual assessment and reviewing information already available to them.

    The assessment may help clarify what is happening.

    But it may not provide a diagnosis.

    A useful question is:

    “Based on what I have observed and assessed, is this sufficiently different or concerning that somebody else now needs to know, review, decide or act?”

    If it is, the physiotherapist communicates what has changed, the relevant findings, what they have already done and why they are concerned.

    They do not need to establish the underlying diagnosis before escalating.

    Their responsibility is to recognise the change, gather appropriate information, respond to immediate risk and recognise when the situation requires input beyond what they can reasonably manage alone.

    Where the concern itself requires urgent escalation, gathering additional information should not delay the appropriate response.

    Four questions that can help you decide

    1. What has changed?

    Has the person’s condition changed?

    Has new information emerged?

    Has a warning sign appeared?

    2. What is the potential risk?

    What could happen if nothing changes?

    Is risk increasing?

    Could delay matter?

    Could continuing expose somebody to avoidable harm?

    3. Can I safely manage this within my role?

    Sometimes a concern remains within your competence and responsibility.

    Sometimes you reach a boundary.

    You may need expertise you do not have, different authority, or a local pathway may require somebody else to be informed.

    4. Does somebody else now need to know, review, decide or act?

    Even if you cannot completely explain what is happening, ask whether an appropriate colleague now reasonably needs to be involved.

    What should an escalation sound like?

    A useful escalation makes the change, concern and requested action clear.

    Instead of:

    “Can you come and have a look? I’m not really sure.”

    you might say:

    “Her pain has increased significantly over the last hour and she is much more drowsy than when I assessed her earlier. I’m concerned about the change and I’d like her reviewed.”

    You have not claimed certainty.

    You have made clear what has changed, why you are concerned and what you need to happen next.

    How to Explain Your Clinical Reasoning Clearly as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional → explores this skill in more detail.

    What if I escalate and it turns out to be nothing?

    If nothing serious is identified, it can be tempting to conclude:

    “I overreacted.”

    Instead ask:

    Was escalation reasonable based on the information and potential risk available at the time?

    A reassuring outcome does not automatically mean escalation was unnecessary.

    The purpose of escalation is not to predict the future perfectly.

    It is to respond proportionately to what you know at the time.

    What if a senior colleague dismisses my concern?

    Telling one person does not necessarily mean your professional responsibility has ended.

    If you continue to believe there is a material safety concern, the situation is deteriorating or the response seems disproportionate, follow the escalation procedures appropriate to your role, profession and organisation.

    That does not mean approaching people until somebody agrees with you.

    It means remaining appropriately responsible for a concern you reasonably believe still requires attention.

    The hidden curriculum: knowing when responsibility needs to widen

    Newly qualified healthcare professionals are expected to become increasingly autonomous.

    But autonomy does not mean dealing with everything alone.

    Sometimes you can assess, decide and proceed.

    Sometimes you need advice.

    Sometimes another professional needs to review the situation.

    And sometimes risk means responsibility must widen quickly.

    Part of autonomy is recognising when independence is no longer the safest response.

    The Core & Oak perspective

    Appropriate escalation is not the opposite of independence.

    It is one of the ways you demonstrate that you understand your responsibility.

    You recognised that something had changed.

    You considered the potential risk.

    You understood the limits of what you could safely manage.

    And you recognised when somebody else needed to become involved.

    That is not handing responsibility away.

    It is knowing when responsibility needs to widen.

    And that is professional judgement in action.

    FREE RESOURCE

    What to Say When You’re Unsure

    Recognising that somebody else needs to become involved is only part of escalation. You also need to communicate the concern clearly.

    Our free practical guide includes example language to help early-career healthcare professionals:

    • raise a concern with a senior colleague;
    • explain what they have already noticed or considered;
    • ask clearly for the support or review they need; and
    • communicate uncertainty without pretending to have an answer they do not have.

    Get the free What to Say When You’re Unsure guide →

    Continue exploring early practice

    If you know you need somebody else’s input but hesitate to ask

    How to Ask for Help Without Feeling Incompetent →

    Learn how to organise your thinking, explain what you already know and ask for support clearly.

    If the difficult part is explaining why you are concerned

    How to Explain Your Clinical Reasoning Clearly as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional →

    Explore how to make the connection between what you have noticed, what you think it means and what you believe should happen next.

    If uncertainty is making it difficult to decide whether to act

    Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty →

    Explore how safe and defensible decisions can still be made when complete certainty is unavailable.

    About the author

    Dr Michael McCluskey is a Chartered Physiotherapist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, with experience across clinical practice, healthcare education, programme leadership, assessment and curriculum development.

    He founded Core & Oak to create evidence-informed professional development that makes the hidden expectations of healthcare practice clearer.

    Professional education disclaimer

    This article provides general professional education. It does not provide individual clinical, employment, legal or other professional advice.

    Healthcare professionals should work within their scope of practice and follow the professional standards, clinical guidance, escalation procedures, policies and processes relevant to their profession, role, patient group and organisation.

    Where an urgent or emergency concern exists, practitioners should follow the appropriate local escalation or emergency procedure.

    Further reading

    Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of conduct, performance and ethics. Effective from 1 September 2024.

    Particularly relevant to recognising limits, managing risk, communicating appropriately and raising concerns within professional practice.

    Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates.

    Includes expectations relating to preserving safety, recognising and responding to risk, raising concerns and practising within competence.

    General Medical Council. Good medical practice.

    Includes professional expectations relating to patient safety, working within competence, responding to risks and communicating concerns appropriately.

  • How to Receive Feedback Without Becoming Defensive as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional

    How to Receive Feedback Without Becoming Defensive as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional

    You have just finished explaining what you did.

    Your senior colleague listens and says:

    “Next time, I think you need to…”

    Before they finish, you can already feel yourself preparing a response.

    But I did think about that.

    They don’t know everything that happened.

    That’s not really fair.

    You start explaining why you made the decision.

    The more you explain, the more it sounds as though you are arguing.

    Later, you replay the conversation and wonder:

    Why did I get so defensive?

    Receiving feedback can feel surprisingly personal when you are newly qualified.

    You have spent years being assessed. You are trying to establish yourself as a credible professional. When someone questions something you have done, it can easily feel as though they are questioning whether you are good enough to be there.

    But feedback about something you did is not automatically a judgement about who you are as a practitioner.

    Learning to separate those two things is an important part of professional development.

    In Brief

    Feeling defensive when you receive feedback is not unusual.

    Feeling defensive is also not the same as responding defensively.

    The professional skill is creating enough space between the feeling and your response.

    When feedback catches you off guard:

    Pause. Clarify. Consider. Act.

    You do not have to agree with every piece of feedback you receive.

    But it helps to understand it before you decide whether it is useful.

    The goal is not:

    “How do I prove I was right?”

    A better question is:

    “What, if anything, can I learn or change from this?”

    Professional credibility includes how you respond when your judgement is challenged.

    Making your reasoning visible allows other people to question it; learning to respond to that challenge is the next part of professional development.

    Why can feedback feel so personal after qualifying?

    For much of your training, feedback was closely connected to assessment.

    Someone observed what you did.

    They judged it against a standard.

    Sometimes that judgement affected whether you passed.

    It is understandable if some of that feeling follows you into professional practice.

    So:

    “Your handover could have been clearer.”

    can quickly become:

    “I’m bad at handover.”

    and then:

    “They don’t think I’m competent.”

    Those are three different statements.

    If feedback quickly becomes evidence in your mind that you do not really belong, Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters? → explores why that reaction can be so strong early in practice.

    Useful feedback should help you examine your practice – something you did, decided or communicated.

    It should not require you to turn one event into a judgement about your entire professional identity.

    That distinction is especially important early in your career, when confidence and professional identity are still developing.

    Core & Oak infographic showing feedback about a handover being reframed into the question, “Which part was unclear, and what would you expect next time?”

    How to stop becoming defensive when you receive feedback

    1. Pause before explaining

    A defensive response often begins with:

    “Yes, but…”

    Sometimes there genuinely is important context the other person does not know.

    But if you explain it before you have understood their point, it may sound as though your main aim is to prove that you were right.

    Try:

    “Okay. Can you talk me through what you noticed?”

    Or:

    “Can you explain which part concerned you?”

    That gives you a moment to understand the feedback before deciding whether further explanation is needed.

    2. Clarify what they actually mean

    Not all feedback is specific enough to be useful.

    “You need to be more confident.”

    “Your documentation needs to improve.”

    “You need to communicate more clearly.”

    What exactly should change?

    Ask:

    “Can you give me an example?”

    “Which part would you have approached differently?”

    “What would you expect to see next time?”

    Specific feedback is easier to act on than a broad judgement.

    3. Consider it without automatically accepting it

    Feedback is information.

    It is not automatically correct simply because it comes from someone more experienced.

    Another practitioner may have noticed something important.

    They may also have different information, preferences or expectations.

    Ask yourself:

    • Is there something here I had not considered?
    • Is this a pattern I have heard before?
    • What part of the feedback is useful?
    • Is there relevant context that needs explaining?
    • Would I do anything differently next time?

    You can take feedback seriously without treating every comment as unquestionable.

    4. Decide what happens next

    Useful engagement with feedback should eventually lead somewhere.

    That might be:

    “Next time I’ll state the main concern at the beginning of the handover.”

    Or:

    “I’ll check the local guidance because I wasn’t aware of that expectation.”

    Or even:

    “I’ve thought about it and I’d still make the same decision, but I can see that I need to explain my reasoning more clearly.”

    The important shift is from defending your identity to evaluating your practice.

    A worked example

    A newly qualified healthcare professional gives a detailed handover about a patient.

    Afterwards, their supervisor says:

    “There was a lot of useful information there, but I wasn’t clear what you were actually concerned about.”

    Their immediate reaction is:

    But I gave you all the information.

    They could respond:

    “I did explain everything that had happened.”

    That may be true.

    But it does not help them understand the feedback.

    Instead, they ask:

    “Can you tell me where you felt the main concern became unclear?”

    The supervisor explains that the key change in the patient’s presentation appeared quite late in the handover.

    The practitioner thinks about this and responds:

    “That makes sense. I was trying to be thorough, but I can see that the important change got buried. Next time I’ll lead with the concern and then give the supporting detail.”

    Notice what they have not done.

    They have not agreed that the whole handover was poor.

    They have not pretended the feedback felt comfortable.

    They have identified one useful change.

    That is a professional response to feedback.

    The hidden curriculum: people notice how you respond when challenged

    Early in your career, it is easy to assume professional credibility comes from demonstrating that your decisions were correct.

    But colleagues are also learning something else:

    What happens when your judgement is questioned?

    Can you listen?

    Can you ask for clarification?

    Can you explain your reasoning without becoming combative?

    Can you recognise when somebody else has noticed something useful?

    Can you change your practice when appropriate?

    These expectations are not always made explicit in day-to-day practice.

    But they influence how colleagues experience working with you.

    Being open to feedback does not mean becoming passive or unquestioning.

    It means being able to examine your practice without treating every challenge as a threat.

    What if the feedback feels unfair?

    Not all feedback is good feedback.

    It can be vague.

    Poorly timed.

    Inconsistent.

    Delivered badly.

    Or based on incomplete information.

    You are allowed to ask questions.

    For example:

    “I’d like to understand the specific concern.”

    “Can we talk through what you would expect me to do differently?”

    You can also take time to reflect, discuss it in supervision or seek another perspective before deciding what you think.

    And there is an important boundary here.

    Receiving feedback professionally does not mean accepting disrespectful, discriminatory or inappropriate behaviour simply because somebody describes it as feedback.

    The aim is thoughtful engagement, not unquestioning compliance.

    A useful question after difficult feedback

    Instead of asking:

    “Was the other person right?”

    try:

    “What information does this give me?”

    Perhaps the feedback identifies something in your practice you genuinely need to develop.

    Perhaps it shows that your reasoning was sound but your communication was unclear.

    Perhaps it reveals a difference in expectations that needs discussing.

    Perhaps, after reflection, you decide you would still make the same professional judgement.

    All of those outcomes are possible.

    The important thing is that you have considered the feedback rather than simply resisted it.

    Reflection

    Think about a recent piece of feedback that was difficult to hear.

    Ask yourself:

    1. What was actually said?
    2. What did I immediately think it meant about me?
    3. What part of the feedback was useful?
    4. Is there any context I still need to explain or clarify?
    5. What, if anything, will I do differently next time?

    Feedback becomes professionally useful when you can examine it without allowing one moment to become a verdict on your whole capability.

    The Core & Oak Perspective

    Being credible does not mean never being corrected.

    It does not mean defending every decision.

    And it does not mean automatically agreeing with whoever is more senior.

    Professional credibility includes being able to stay open when your judgement is challenged.

    Sometimes feedback will confirm something you already suspected.

    Sometimes it will reveal something you had not noticed.

    Sometimes you will decide, after thinking carefully, that you would still make the same decision.

    What matters is that you can listen, understand, evaluate and respond.

    Being trustworthy does not require you to be beyond challenge.

    It requires you to be capable of learning from it.

    Want more practical guidance for early professional practice?

    Core & Oak explores the parts of healthcare practice that are often expected but rarely explained clearly — professional judgement, communication, uncertainty and the hidden curriculum of becoming a trusted practitioner.

    Join the Core & Oak mailing list for new articles and practical resources.

    Continue exploring early practice

    If explaining your thinking when somebody questions it feels difficult

    How to Explain Your Clinical Reasoning Clearly as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional →

    Learn how to make the reasoning behind your decisions easier for other people to understand.

    If feedback quickly makes you question whether you belong

    Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters? →

    Explore why increasing responsibility can make capable early-career professionals feel less confident rather than more.

    If uncertainty itself is making it difficult to make decisions

    Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty →

    Explore how safe professional judgement can still be possible when complete certainty is unavailable.

    Want to develop these skills more systematically?

    Being able to explain your reasoning is one part of communicating confidently in professional practice.

    Professional Communication in Everyday Healthcare takes this further through realistic situations involving uncertainty, escalation, asking for support, difficult conversations, feedback and communicating under pressure.

    If you want a structured way to develop these capabilities rather than picking them up only through trial and error, the course provides approximately 10 hours of self-paced CPD designed specifically for early-career healthcare professionals.

    About the author

    Dr Michael McCluskey is a Chartered Physiotherapist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, with experience across clinical practice, healthcare education, programme leadership, assessment and curriculum development.

    He founded Core & Oak to create evidence-informed professional development that makes the hidden expectations of healthcare practice clearer.

    Professional education disclaimer

    This article provides general professional education. It does not provide individual clinical, employment, legal or other professional advice.

    Healthcare professionals should follow the professional standards, policies and procedures relevant to their profession, role and organisation.

    Further Reading

    Hardavella G, Aamli-Gaagnat A, Saad N, Rousalova I, Sreter KB. How to give and receive 
feedback effectively. Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Dec;13(4):327-333. doi: 10.1183/20734735.009917. PMID: 29209427; PMCID: PMC5709796.

    Algiraigri AH. Ten tips for receiving feedback effectively in clinical practice. Med Educ Online. 2014 Jul 28;19:25141. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25141. PMID: 25079664; PMCID: PMC4116619.

  • How to Explain Your Clinical Reasoning Clearly as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional

    How to Explain Your Clinical Reasoning Clearly as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional

    You have assessed the patient.

    You have an idea of what you think is happening.

    You know roughly what you think should happen next.

    Then someone asks:

    “Why?”

    And suddenly the explanation that felt reasonably clear in your head becomes much harder to say out loud.

    You start listing everything you noticed.

    You add some background information.

    You mention another possibility.

    Then another.

    Halfway through, you realise you are no longer sure what your actual point was.

    This can be particularly uncomfortable when you are newly qualified.

    You may worry that a more experienced healthcare professional would have explained the situation more clearly.

    Or that struggling to articulate your reasoning means you did not really understand it in the first place.

    Usually, the reality is simpler.

    Knowing what you think and being able to explain how you reached that judgement are related skills. But they are not exactly the same skill.

    Learning to connect them is an important part of becoming a healthcare professional.

    In Brief

    Clinical reasoning is the process of making sense of information so that you can decide what it means and what should happen next.

    Different professions use different terms, including clinical reasoningprofessional reasoning and clinical decision-making. The exact form varies between roles, but the challenge is similar: interpreting information and deciding what it means for practice.

    You increasingly need to communicate enough of that reasoning for colleagues and patients to understand the basis of your judgement.

    That does not mean explaining everything you considered.

    It means becoming clearer about:

    • What you noticed.
    • What you think it means.
    • What you are uncertain or concerned about.
    • What you think should happen next and why.

    This is one of the less visible transitions from student to practitioner.

    You are no longer only learning to make reasonable decisions.

    You are learning to make the reasoning behind them visible.

    What is clinical reasoning in healthcare?

    Clinical reasoning looks different across healthcare professions.

    It might involve interpreting an assessment, reviewing medication, deciding whether a change requires escalation, judging whether someone is safe to progress, or deciding what further information is needed.

    The process often moves from:

    information → interpretation → judgement → action

    Clinical reasoning is therefore not simply about how much you know.

    It is about what you do with what you know.

    This is particularly relevant during the transition into practice. A UK systematic review of newly qualified allied health professionals found that graduates were generally well prepared in terms of knowledge, while responsibility and decision-making were among the areas where under-preparedness was more consistently identified.

    So if this transition feels difficult, the problem may not be a lack of knowledge.

    It may be learning how to prioritise, interpret and communicate that knowledge in real practice.

    Clinical reasoning is not the same as listing everything you know

    Imagine a colleague asks why you are concerned about a patient.

    You respond by describing:

    their diagnosis;

    their medical history;

    their medication;

    everything they told you;

    every assessment finding;

    and several things you think might possibly be happening.

    All of that information may be accurate.

    But the listener may still be waiting for the most important part:

    What does it mean?

    Early-career practitioners can sometimes communicate the whole case because they are trying to demonstrate that they have been thorough.

    Experienced practitioners often communicate something more condensed.

    Not necessarily because they considered fewer things.

    They may simply be better at recognising which information materially affects the decision.

    Information is not the same as interpretation.

    Compare:

    “His respiratory rate is 25, his temperature is 37.8 and he says he feels tired.”

    with:

    “His respiratory rate has increased from 17 to 25 over the last two hours and he looks more unwell than earlier. That change concerns me, even though the rest of his observations are relatively stable, so I’d like him reviewed.”

    The second explanation makes the reasoning easier to see.

    It shows:

    what changed → why it matters → what concerns you → what should happen next.

    The practitioner has not necessarily gathered more information.

    They have made the significance of that information clearer.

    Infographic comparing clinical information with interpretation, showing how observations are turned into concern, judgement and a decision to request review.

    Why can this feel difficult when you are newly qualified?

    As a student, your reasoning is often supported by prompts.

    A supervisor might ask:

    “What do you think that means?”

    “What concerns you?”

    “What would you do next?”

    “Why?”

    After qualification, those prompts become less visible.

    You are increasingly expected to organise that thinking yourself and communicate it during handover, supervision, MDT discussion, referral, escalation or documentation.

    Experienced practitioners can also make this process look deceptively simple.

    They may listen to a complicated presentation and summarise the main issue in two or three sentences.

    That does not necessarily mean they thought about fewer things.

    Experience helps practitioners recognise what matters most, what uncertainty changes the decision and what can remain in the background.

    The goal early in your career is not to sound like someone with ten years of experience.

    It is to become progressively clearer about the connection between the information you have and the judgement you are making.

    Four questions that can make your reasoning clearer

    These questions are not a clinical reasoning model.

    They are a communication scaffold for moments when your reasoning makes sense internally but is difficult to explain.

    1. What have I noticed?

    Start with the information that materially matters.

    • What changed?
    • What did the patient tell you?
    • What did you observe?
    • What did the assessment, review or record show?

    Instead of asking:

    “What information do I have?”

    try:

    “Which information changes the decision?”

    That helps you move from reporting everything towards identifying what is significant.

    2. What do I think it means?

    This is where information becomes interpretation.

    You might say:

    “The main issue I think we’re dealing with is…”

    “That makes me concerned about…”

    “I think this matters because…”

    You do not have to pretend your interpretation is certain.

    Sometimes the most accurate explanation will be:

    “I’m not sure what is causing the change, but it is different from earlier and I don’t think it should be ignored.”

    That is still reasoning.

    3. What am I uncertain or concerned about?

    Clear reasoning does not require uncertainty to disappear.

    Often it helps to locate it.

    For example:

    “I’m comfortable with the assessment findings, but I’m uncertain whether the change is significant enough to alter the plan.”

    Or:

    “There are two reasonable options. My concern with proceeding today is…”

    Being specific about uncertainty shows both what you think and where the limits of that judgement are.

    If you find yourself waiting until you feel completely certain before you can act, read Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty →

    4. What do I think should happen next and why?

    Now make the reasoning actionable.

    What are you proposing?

    Continue?

    Review?

    Reassess?

    Gather more information?

    Seek another opinion?

    Escalate?

    Then connect the action to your reasoning.

    For example:

    “Because her symptoms have changed since this morning, I think she needs reassessing before we continue with the original plan.”

    Or:

    “I’ve reached the limit of what I can establish from my assessment and, because the consequences of missing this could be significant, I’d like another opinion.”

    Sometimes good reasoning does not lead to the final answer.

    Sometimes it leads to:

    “I don’t yet know what this means, but I know enough to recognise that it needs checking.”

    That is still professional judgement.

    And when another person’s input is needed, knowing how to ask clearly becomes part of the same process. How to Ask for Help Without Feeling Incompetent → explores how to organise that request without pretending that you already know the answer.

    A worked example

    Imagine a newly qualified occupational therapist assessing a patient who may be returning home.

    The patient is independently mobile around the ward and managing basic personal care.

    The OT is still concerned.

    When asked why, their first explanation is:

    “I’m just not sure they’re ready yet. They were a bit muddled earlier and I’m worried about them going home.”

    The concern may be reasonable.

    But another professional cannot yet see exactly what is driving the judgement.

    What have I noticed?

    During a kitchen assessment, the patient repeatedly forgot that the hob had been switched on and required prompting.

    What do I think it means?

    The difficulty appears when the task requires the patient to manage several pieces of information independently.

    What am I concerned about?

    They live alone and will need to prepare meals without someone present to prompt them.

    What do I think should happen next?

    The OT explains:

    “They’re managing personal care and mobility independently, but during the kitchen assessment they repeatedly forgot the hob was on and needed prompting. Because they live alone, I’m concerned about how safely they can manage meal preparation without support. I’d like to explore that risk further before I’m comfortable supporting the current discharge plan.”

    The OT has not suddenly developed more expertise.

    They have made the reasoning easier to see.

    That allows the wider team to respond to the judgement.

    Someone may provide information the OT did not have.

    Someone may challenge the interpretation.

    The team may identify additional support.

    Or the original concern may be reinforced.

    Visible reasoning allows professional judgement to become collaborative rather than private.

    Want to see where your communication already feels more confident?

    Being able to explain your reasoning is one part of communicating confidently in early professional practice.

    Our free Early-Career Communication Confidence Checklist can help you identify which situations already feel more comfortable, where you still hesitate and what you might want to strengthen next.

    Get the free Communication Confidence Checklist →

    The hidden curriculum: colleagues gradually learn how you think

    Early in your career, it is easy to assume that professional credibility comes mainly from knowing the answer.

    Knowledge matters.

    But colleagues also gradually learn whether you can:

    • identify what is important;
    • recognise when something does not fit;
    • understand the limits of your knowledge or role;
    • respond proportionately to risk;
    • explain your judgement; and
    • involve other people appropriately.

    These expectations are not always taught explicitly.

    They are part of healthcare’s hidden curriculum.

    The lesson is not:

    You must always be right.

    It is:

    Other people need enough access to your reasoning to understand whether your judgement is reasonable.

    That matters for credibility.

    But it also matters for safety and learning.

    Reasoning that can be seen can also be questioned, refined and improved.

    What if someone disagrees with your reasoning?

    Making your reasoning clear does not guarantee that another healthcare professional will agree with it.

    Nor should it.

    Another practitioner may have information you do not have.

    A more experienced colleague may notice something you missed.

    A different profession may interpret the situation from another perspective.

    Being able to say:

    “This was my reasoning…”

    therefore opens the conversation rather than ending it.

    You might hear:

    “I can see why you thought that. Have you also considered…?”

    A useful question afterwards is not only:

    “Was I right?”

    Try:

    “What did they notice that I didn’t?”

    That turns disagreement into information you can use next time.

    If having your thinking questioned makes you worry that other people are discovering you are not as capable as they thought, read Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters? →

    Use supervision to learn how experienced practitioners think

    One way to improve your reasoning is to ask questions that reveal how another practitioner reached their judgement, rather than only whether your answer was correct.

    Instead of asking only:

    “Was that right?”

    try:

    “What were the main things you were paying attention to there?”

    “What made that finding important?”

    “What would have changed your decision?”

    “What did you notice that I hadn’t prioritised?”

    You can also reflect afterwards:

    • What information turned out to matter most?
    • What did I initially focus on that mattered less?
    • What changed the decision?
    • What might I recognise earlier next time?

    Those questions help turn one experience into something you can carry forward.

    What clear clinical reasoning can sound like

    Clear reasoning does not always sound decisive.

    Sometimes it sounds like:

    “Based on the information we have at the moment, I think…”

    “The most important change is…”

    “The part I’m uncertain about is…”

    “I need another opinion because…”

    “I don’t know yet. I need to check.”

    These statements do not necessarily weaken professional credibility.

    They make the judgement easier to locate.

    The listener can understand what you think, why you think it, what limits that interpretation and what you think should happen next.

    Reflection

    Think about a recent situation in which you knew roughly what you thought but found it difficult to explain.

    Ask yourself:

    1. What did I notice?
    2. What did I think it meant?
    3. What was I uncertain or concerned about?
    4. What did I think should happen next and why?

    Then ask:

    Could another healthcare professional understand my judgement from that explanation?

    You are not trying to produce perfect wording.

    You are practising the connection between reasoning and communication.

    The Core & Oak Perspective

    Early in your career, it is easy to believe that credibility comes from knowing the answer.

    Knowledge is essential.

    But professional practice asks something more of you.

    You have to decide which information matters.

    You have to interpret it.

    You have to recognise uncertainty and risk.

    And increasingly, you have to explain the professional basis for what you decide.

    That is part of healthcare’s hidden curriculum.

    Your reasoning cannot always remain invisible.

    Other people need enough access to it to understand, challenge and trust your judgement.

    That does not mean sounding impressive.

    It does not mean explaining everything you know.

    And it does not require perfect certainty.

    It means becoming increasingly able to say:

    This is what I noticed.

    This is what I think it means.

    This is what I am uncertain or concerned about.

    And this is why I think this is the safest reasonable next step.

    That is more than communicating a decision.

    It is making professional judgement visible.

    Your next step

    FREE RESOURCE

    Early-Career Communication Confidence Checklist

    Being able to explain your reasoning is one part of communicating confidently in early professional practice.

    A practical self-review tool to help you identify:

    • communication situations that already feel more comfortable;
    • situations where you still hesitate;
    • areas you may want to strengthen; and
    • useful priorities for your ongoing development.

    Get the Free Communication Checklist →

    Continue exploring early practice

    If making decisions when you are uncertain is the difficult part:

    Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty → Explore how to make safe, proportionate and defensible decisions when complete certainty is unavailable.

    If you know you need another person’s input but struggle to ask clearly

    How to Ask for Help Without Feeling Incompetent → Learn how to organise your thinking, explain what you have already considered and ask for support clearly.

    If explaining your thinking makes you feel exposed or inexperienced

    Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters? → Explore why professional responsibility can increase faster than confidence, even while your capability is developing.

    Want to develop these skills more systematically?

    CONTINUE YOUR DEVELOPMENT

    Being able to explain your reasoning is one part of communicating confidently in professional practice.

    Professional Communication in Everyday Healthcare takes this further through realistic situations involving uncertainty, escalation, asking for support, difficult conversations, feedback and communicating under pressure.

    If you want a structured way to develop these capabilities rather than picking them up only through trial and error, the course provides approximately 10 hours of self-paced CPD designed specifically for early-career healthcare professionals.

    About the author

    Dr Michael McCluskey is a Chartered Physiotherapist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, with experience across clinical practice, healthcare education, programme leadership, assessment and curriculum development.

    He founded Core & Oak to create evidence-informed professional development that makes the hidden expectations of healthcare practice clearer.

    Professional education disclaimer

    This article provides general professional education. It does not provide individual clinical, employment, legal or other professional advice.

    Healthcare professionals should work within their scope of practice and follow the policies, escalation procedures and professional standards relevant to their profession, role and organisation.

    Editorial and evidence standards

    Core & Oak content is developed using the following principles:

    • Content is written or reviewed by a suitably qualified professional.
    • Professional and regulatory sources are prioritised where relevant.
    • Research evidence is interpreted cautiously and within its limitations.
    • Practical guidance is distinguished from individual clinical advice.
    • Uncertainty, contextual variation and system pressures are acknowledged.
    • Articles are periodically reviewed and updated.
    • Commercial links are included only where the resource is relevant to the reader’s identified need.

    Further reading

    Brennan, N., Burns, L., Mattick, K., Mitchell, A., Henderson, T., Walker, K. and Gale, T. (2024). How prepared are newly qualified allied health professionals for practice in the UK? A systematic review. BMJ Open, 14, e081518.

    Brentnall J, Thackray D, Judd B. Evaluating the Clinical Reasoning of Student Health Professionals in Placement and Simulation Settings: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020936. PMID: 35055758; PMCID: PMC8775520.


  • Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty

    Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty

    You have assessed the patient.

    You have checked the information available to you.

    Nothing suggests that immediate escalation is required.

    You have explained your reasoning to a colleague, and they agree with your plan.

    But you still find yourself thinking:

    What if I am wrong?

    Building confidence as a newly qualified healthcare professional is not simply about becoming more certain.

    One of the harder parts of early practice is learning to make reasonable decisions when some uncertainty remains.

    As a student, confidence can feel closely connected to knowing the answer.

    You revise. You practise. You are assessed. Someone tells you whether you were right.

    Professional practice is different.

    Information can be incomplete. A patient’s presentation can change. Several reasonable options may exist. Guidance may inform your decision without telling you exactly what to do.

    Sometimes you have to decide what happens next before you can know exactly how the situation will unfold.

    That does not make safe practice guesswork.

    It means professional confidence has to become something more useful than certainty.

    In Brief

    Professional confidence in healthcare does not mean being certain that you are right.

    Safe practice means using the information available, recognising uncertainty and risk, working within your scope, seeking support when needed and reviewing your decision when new information emerges.

    Experienced practitioners still encounter uncertainty.

    What develops is their ability to work safely within it.

    Why newly qualified healthcare professionals can struggle with confidence

    For much of your education, uncertainty had an obvious solution:

    Learn more.

    If you did not know something, you could revise it.

    If you were unsure how to perform a skill, you could practise it.

    That is necessary while developing professional knowledge.

    But it can quietly create another expectation:

    Competent practitioners eventually know enough to stop being uncertain.

    They do not.

    Healthcare contains incomplete information, changing circumstances, competing priorities and decisions where more than one course of action may be reasonable.

    Research with newly qualified doctors suggests that uncertainty during the transition into practice arises not only from clinical situations, but also from unfamiliar responsibilities, professional boundaries and expectations. Support, time and the perceived stakes of the situation can all affect how that uncertainty is experienced.

    The difference with experience is often not the disappearance of uncertainty.

    It is the ability to ask better questions about it:

    • What do I know?
    • What don’t I know?
    • What matters here?
    • What would make this unsafe?
    • What needs to happen next?

    That is a different kind of confidence.

    Sometimes, becoming more aware of this complexity can actually make you feel less confident for a while. One reason imposter feelings can become particularly noticeable in early practice.

    Safe practice does not require perfect certainty

    Consider a newly qualified health professional assessing a patient who has developed increasing pain.

    Nothing in the assessment immediately indicates an emergency, but the presentation is not entirely straightforward.

    One response might be:

    “I’m probably worrying unnecessarily. I don’t want to look inexperienced.”

    Another might be:

    “I can’t do anything until I am completely certain what this is.”

    Neither is particularly useful.

    A better professional question is:

    Do I have enough information to make a safe and reasonable decision about what needs to happen next?

    The answer might be to continue the assessment.

    It might be to check something, gather more information, modify the plan, involve a colleague or escalate for further assessment.

    Safe practice can therefore look surprisingly ordinary:

    • noticing that something does not fit;
    • checking relevant information;
    • asking another question;
    • recognising the limits of your knowledge or role;
    • explaining and documenting your reasoning;
    • giving appropriate follow-up or safety-netting advice;
    • reviewing the situation when new information emerges; and
    • involving someone else when the level of uncertainty or risk requires it.

    None of these behaviours requires perfect certainty.

    They require professional judgement.

    The hidden curriculum: people notice how you reason

    Early in your career, it is easy to assume that experienced colleagues are mainly judging how much you know.

    Knowledge matters.

    But colleagues also gradually learn whether you can recognise uncertainty, identify what matters, understand your limits, explain your reasoning, respond to new information and involve other people appropriately.

    They are seeing how you think when the answer is not obvious.

    This is part of healthcare’s hidden curriculum.

    Your judgement becomes more trustworthy when other people can understand the reasoning behind it.

    That is why professional confidence does not need to sound like certainty.

    Part of making that judgement visible is knowing when uncertainty means you should involve someone else and being able to ask for help clearly rather than waiting until you feel completely sure.

    How to make a safe decision when you are uncertain

    Instead of asking:

    “Am I sure?”

    try four more useful questions.

    1. What information do I have?

    Separate what you actually know from what you fear might be true.

    What have you observed?

    What has the patient told you?

    What information is available from the assessment, record, investigations or wider team?

    Start with the information you genuinely have.

    2. What remains uncertain?

    Name the gap.

    Perhaps you need more information.

    Perhaps the situation has more than one reasonable explanation.

    Perhaps you have reached the boundary of your knowledge or scope.

    Perhaps the uncertainty cannot currently be eliminated.

    A specific uncertainty is easier to respond to than a general feeling that:

    “Something might be wrong.”

    3. What would make this unsafe?

    Ask:

    Is there something that requires urgent action?

    Is important information missing?

    Would proceeding take me beyond my role or competence?

    Is the potential consequence significant enough that I need another opinion?

    What change would make me reconsider the plan?

    The objective is not to prove that nothing can go wrong.

    It is to recognise when uncertainty changes what safe practice requires.

    4. What is the safest reasonable next step?

    Not the perfect step.

    Not the decision that guarantees the outcome.

    The safest reasonable next step based on what you know now.

    That may be to:

    Prepare. Check. Clarify. Ask. Escalate. Reflect.

    Sometimes it will also be:

    Proceed.

    Four-step framework for making safe decisions under uncertainty: identify what you know, what remains uncertain, what could make the situation unsafe, and the safest reasonable next step.

    Learning when it is reasonable to proceed despite some remaining uncertainty is part of becoming an autonomous practitioner.

    But proceeding despite uncertainty is not the same as ignoring uncertainty.

    If you cannot reasonably assess the risk, important information is missing, the decision falls outside your scope, or there is a concern about immediate safety, the appropriate action may be to stop, check, seek advice or escalate.

    That distinction is fundamental.

    A recent UK systematic review of newly qualified allied health professionals found that graduates were generally well prepared in terms of knowledge, while responsibility and decision-making were among the areas where under-preparedness was more consistently identified. 

    What professional confidence can sound like

    Confidence does not always sound decisive.

    Sometimes it sounds like:

    “Based on what we know at the moment, I think…”

    “The part I’m uncertain about is…”

    “There are two reasonable options. My preference is this one because…”

    “My concern would increase if…”

    “Something doesn’t fit with what I expected, so I’d like another opinion.”

    “I don’t know yet. I need to check.”

    Those statements do not necessarily weaken professional credibility.

    They can make your reasoning clearer.

    The confidence comes from being able to locate the uncertainty and decide what it requires, rather than pretending it does not exist.

    Want to take stock of your own communication confidence?

    Confidence in early practice isn’t all-or-nothing. You may feel comfortable in some situations while still finding others difficult.

    Our free Early-Career Communication Confidence Checklist can help you identify what already feels more confident, where you still hesitate, and what you might want to strengthen next.

    Get the free Communication Confidence Checklist →

    What if I make the wrong decision?

    This fear sits underneath many early-career decisions.

    Sometimes you will look back at a decision and realise that, with what you know now, you would choose differently.

    That deserves reflection.

    But hindsight changes the information available to you.

    A poor outcome does not automatically mean that the original decision was unreasonable.

    Just as importantly, a good outcome does not automatically mean that the decision-making was sound.

    When reviewing a decision, ask:

    • What information was available at the time?
    • Was relevant risk considered?
    • Was the decision within my scope?
    • Did I follow relevant guidance?
    • Did I involve someone else when I needed to?
    • Was my reasoning proportionate to the situation?

    Was the decision within my scope?

    This moves reflection away from:

    “Did everything turn out well?”

    towards:

    “Was the way I reached and reviewed the decision professionally reasonable?”

    Professional judgement is not reserved for situations where the answer is obvious. The Nursing and Midwifery Council, for example, describes nurses, midwives and nursing associates as using professional judgement to make decisions every day, while recognising that difficult circumstances can challenge that judgement.

    Defensible does not mean defensive

    The word defensible can sound as though healthcare professionals should make decisions primarily to protect themselves.

    That is not what it means here.

    Defensible practice means that your decision has a professional basis that you can explain.

    Compare:

    “I thought it would probably be fine.”

    with:

    “Based on the assessment at that point, I had not identified features requiring immediate escalation. I explained what to monitor, arranged appropriate follow-up and advised what to do if the situation changed.”

    The second account does not guarantee a good outcome.

    It makes the reasoning visible.

    That distinction matters when decisions are reviewed later.

    Confidence develops through decisions, not certainty

    Professional confidence often grows quietly.

    You encounter something unfamiliar.

    You assess what you know.

    You recognise what you do not know.

    You decide whether you need more information, another person’s judgement or a different course of action.

    You make a reasonable decision.

    Then you see what happens.

    The next time you encounter something similar, you have more experience to draw on.

    Gradually, the question changes.

    From:

    “How can I be completely sure?”

    to:

    “What do I need to know to make this decision safely?”

    That is significant professional development.

    Reflection

    Think about a recent situation in which you wanted more certainty before making a decision.

    What did you actually need?

    More knowledge?

    More information?

    Another person’s judgement?

    Clarification of your role?

    Or reassurance that nothing could go wrong?

    Then ask:

    What would safe, reasonable and defensible practice have looked like with the information available at the time?

    That question is often more useful than asking whether you felt confident.

    The Core & Oak Perspective

    Professional confidence is not certainty.

    It is not bravado.

    And it is not the absence of doubt.

    It is the growing ability to understand what you know, identify what remains uncertain, recognise risk, make a proportionate decision and remain willing to reconsider it.

    Early in your career, you may imagine experienced practitioners have become confident because they finally know enough to stop being uncertain.

    Usually, something more interesting has happened.

    They have learned which uncertainties matter.

    Which require more information.

    Which require another person’s involvement.

    Which require escalation.

    And which can reasonably remain while they proceed.

    That is not lowering the standard of safe practice.

    It is part of what professional judgement looks like.


    Your Next Step

    If this article resonated with you, these resources may also help:

    FREE RESOURCE

    Early-Career Communication Confidence Checklist

    A practical self-review tool to help you identify:

    • useful priorities for your ongoing professional development
    • communication situations that already feel more comfortable
    • situations where you still hesitate
    • areas you may want to strengthen

    Get the free checklist →

    RELATED ARTICLE

    How much Anxiety is Normal in a Newly Qualified Health Role

    Uncertainty is part of professional practice, but sometimes the search for certainty becomes anxiety. Explore how to recognise the difference and decide what the concern is asking you to do.

    Read the article →

    CONTINUE YOUR DEVELOPMENT

    Professional Communication in Everyday Healthcare

    If you want to develop these skills more systematically, this self-paced CPD course explores how communication, professional judgement and confidence come together in everyday healthcare practice.

    Across approximately 10 hours of learning, you’ll work through realistic situations involving uncertainty, difficult conversations, feedback, escalation and communicating under pressure.

    10 hours CPD · Self-paced · Designed for early-career healthcare professionals

    Continue exploring early practice

    If uncertainty, confidence or professional identity are familiar themes, you may also find these useful:

    How to Ask for Help Without Feeling Incompetent

    When uncertainty means you need another person’s input, learn how to organise your thinking and ask for support clearly.

    Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters?

    Explore why increasing knowledge, responsibility and awareness of complexity can sometimes make you feel less confident rather than more.


    About the author

    Dr Michael McCluskey is a Chartered Physiotherapist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, with experience across clinical practice, healthcare education, programme leadership, assessment and curriculum development.

    He founded Core & Oak to create evidence-informed professional development that makes the hidden expectations of healthcare practice clearer.

    Professional education disclaimer

    This article provides general professional education. It does not provide individual clinical, employment, legal or other professional advice.

    Healthcare professionals should work within their scope of practice and follow the policies, escalation procedures and professional standards relevant to their profession, role and organisation.


  • How Much Anxiety Is Normal in a Newly Qualified Healthcare Role?

    How Much Anxiety Is Normal in a Newly Qualified Healthcare Role?

    You finish your shift and start thinking about one of your patients.

    Did I explain that clearly enough?

    Should I have asked someone to review them earlier?

    Did I miss something?

    You replay the conversation on the drive home.

    Nothing obviously went wrong. You followed the plan. You asked for help when you needed it.

    But the thought is still there.

    What if I got something wrong?

    For many newly qualified healthcare professionals, this can be one of the more unsettling parts of starting work.

    You expected the responsibility.

    You may not have expected how much you would think about it afterwards.

    In Brief

    Some anxiety is common when you begin a healthcare role.

    You are working with more independently, with greater responsibility, making decisions in less predictable situations and becoming more aware of what you do not yet know.

    The important question is not simply:

    “Am I anxious?”

    A more useful question is:

    “What is this anxiety leading me to do?”

    Concern that prompts you to prepare, check, ask, reflect or escalate can be part of developing professional judgement.

    Anxiety that increasingly leads to avoidance, repeated reassurance-seeking, persistent rumination or difficulty functioning deserves a different response.

    And sometimes the problem is not simply confidence. Workload, inadequate support, unclear expectations or workplace culture can make an already demanding transition considerably harder.

    Is it normal to feel anxious in a newly qualified healthcare role?

    It can be.

    Starting professional practice involves a significant change in responsibility.

    As a student, you were learning within systems of highly structured supervision. Decisions could be discussed, checked and often shared with someone more experienced before, during and after interactions.

    After qualification, that relationship begins to change.

    You are increasingly expected to notice what matters, make judgements, communicate concerns and recognise when someone else needs to be involved.

    Your knowledge has not suddenly disappeared.

    What has changed is your relationship with responsibility.

    That distinction matters.

    Feeling uncertain does not automatically mean that you are unprepared for practice. Sometimes it means you are beginning to appreciate the complexity of the work more fully.

    A patient rarely presents like an examination question.

    Information can be incomplete. Priorities compete. People respond unpredictably. Decisions have to be made despite uncertainty.

    Becoming comfortable with that takes time.

    Why can confidence actually fall after qualifying?

    This can feel particularly confusing.

    You spent years developing your knowledge and skills. You qualified. You secured a professional role.

    Surely you should feel more confident?

    Not necessarily.

    As your experience grows, so can your awareness of complexity.

    You begin noticing exceptions.

    You see that the same intervention does not work for everyone.

    You become more aware of risk, competing priorities and the consequences of decisions.

    You start recognising situations where there isn’t one obviously correct answer.

    Paradoxically, greater awareness can temporarily feel like less confidence.

    This overlaps with something we explored in Why New Healthcare Professionals Feel Like Imposters: the transition into professional practice can increase your awareness of what you do not yet know.

    That is not necessarily evidence that you are becoming less capable.

    It can be evidence that your thinking is becoming more sophisticated.

    What are experienced colleagues actually expecting from you?

    This is one of the less visible parts of becoming a healthcare professional.

    New practitioners can assume that credibility comes from appearing confident and knowing the answer.

    Experienced colleagues are often looking for something different.

    They notice whether you:

    • recognise when something does not fit;
    • work within your scope of practice;
    • explain your reasoning;
    • ask appropriate questions;
    • escalate concerns when necessary;
    • respond constructively to feedback; and
    • learn from experience.

    In other words, they are not simply observing what you know.

    They are observing what you do when you don’t know.

    That is part of healthcare’s hidden curriculum.

    Professional credibility develops not from eliminating uncertainty, but from responding to it safely and appropriately.

    This is also why professional confidence does not require complete certainty. Confidence can develop through becoming clearer about how you reason, recognise your limits and decide what to do next.

    When can anxiety actually be useful?

    Anxiety is uncomfortable, so our instinct is often to treat it as something that needs to disappear.

    But a degree of concern can sometimes serve a useful function.

    Imagine you are about to complete an unfamiliar procedure.

    You feel slightly nervous.

    That feeling prompts you to review the guidance, prepare carefully and ask an experienced colleague to confirm something before you begin.

    The anxiety has led to useful professional behaviour.

    Or you are reviewing a patient and something about the presentation does not quite fit.

    You cannot immediately explain why.

    That discomfort makes you stop, reassess and seek another opinion.

    Again, the feeling has prompted action.

    The aim is not to become anxious in order to practise safely.

    It is to recognise that feeling concerned and practising competently can exist at the same time.

    The useful question becomes:

    What is this concern asking me to do?

    Perhaps you need to:

    Prepare.

    Check.

    Clarify.

    Ask.

    Escalate.

    Reflect.

    Once you identify the appropriate professional action, the feeling itself becomes less important than what you do next.

    Know what you need to do, but unsure how to say it?

    Sometimes concern tells you that you need to ask, clarify or escalate. Finding the right words can still be difficult, particularly when you’re newly qualified.

    Our free What to Say When You’re Unsure guide provides practical example language for asking for support, communicating uncertainty and escalating concerns clearly.

    Get the free What to Say When You’re Unsure guide →

    When might anxiety be getting in the way?

    There is an important difference between anxiety that occasionally accompanies responsibility and anxiety that begins to dominate your working life.

    Consider the pattern rather than one difficult shift.

    Are you increasingly:

    • checking the same thing repeatedly despite having appropriate confirmation?
    • avoiding situations primarily because you fear making a mistake?
    • seeking reassurance but finding that it only helps briefly?
    • replaying routine interactions for long periods after work?
    • struggling to switch off even when nothing specific has gone wrong?
    • finding that anxiety is interfering with your ability to work, rest or function outside work?

    These experiences do not tell us, by themselves, what is causing the problem.

    But they are worth taking seriously.

    The appropriate response may be different from simply telling yourself to “be more confident”.

    Depending on the circumstances, that might involve talking with a supervisor or manager, using occupational health or employee support services, or seeking appropriate individual healthcare support.

    Recognising that you need support is not a failure of professional resilience.

    It is another form of responding appropriately to what you notice.

    Not all workplace anxiety is an individual problem

    This distinction is particularly important.

    It is easy to interpret anxiety as evidence that you need to become more confident.

    Sometimes the environment deserves closer attention.

    A newly qualified practitioner working within a supportive team, with accessible supervision and clear expectations, is having a very different professional experience from someone working with chronic understaffing, poor induction, unclear responsibilities or a culture where asking questions is discouraged.

    If you are struggling, it can therefore be useful to ask two questions:

    What is happening within me?

    and

    What is happening around me?

    Both matter.

    Professional development should help practitioners become more capable of managing uncertainty.

    It should not teach them to accept unsafe systems or inadequate support as personal shortcomings.

    A useful way to think about this is not simply to ask whether you feel anxious, but what that feeling is leading you to do.

    Core & Oak infographic showing how early-career healthcare professionals can recognise anxiety and uncertainty, identify helpful professional responses, notice when anxiety is getting in the way, and seek support when needed.

    A practical way to respond when you feel anxious at work

    When you notice anxiety around a clinical or professional situation, try working through three questions.

    1. What am I actually concerned about?

    Be specific.

    Not:

    “I’m worried I’ll get this wrong.”

    But:

    “I’m not confident that I have enough information to make this decision.”

    or:

    “The patient’s presentation has changed and I’m unsure whether they need review.”

    Naming the concern makes it easier to respond to.

    2. What professional action does this concern require?

    Do you need to:

    check something?

    gather more information?

    speak to the patient again?

    review guidance?

    ask a colleague?

    escalate?

    Or have you already taken the reasonable steps available to you?

    3. What happens after I have acted?

    This is often revealing.

    If appropriate action allows you to move on, the concern may have been doing something useful.

    If you continue repeatedly checking, seeking reassurance or replaying the situation despite having acted appropriately, it may be worth noticing that pattern.

    The goal is not to analyse every anxious thought.

    It is to become better at distinguishing professional uncertainty that requires action from anxiety that simply demands more certainty.

    Healthcare can rarely provide complete certainty.

    Professional judgement develops partly through learning to work safely without it.

    Sometimes the appropriate action is to involve someone else. If asking for support itself feels difficult, it can help to organise what you know, what you are uncertain about and what you need from the other person.

    Confidence usually develops quietly

    One of the difficulties with early professional practice is that progress can be hard to see while it is happening.

    You may imagine confidence arriving as a point where you stop feeling nervous.

    More often, the changes are smaller.

    A situation that once occupied your thoughts all evening takes ten minutes to process.

    You still ask your senior colleague, but your question is more focused.

    You recognise earlier when something needs escalating.

    You recover more quickly after making a mistake.

    You stop interpreting every gap in your knowledge as evidence that you do not belong.

    The uncertainty has not disappeared.

    Your relationship with it has changed.

    That is often what professional confidence looks like.

    Reflection

    Think about a recent situation at work that made you anxious.

    What were you actually concerned about?

    What did the feeling lead you to do?

    Did your response help you practise more safely, or did the anxiety continue after you had taken reasonable action?

    Over time, noticing that distinction can tell you a great deal about both your professional judgement and the support you need.

    The Core & Oak Perspective

    The goal of early professional development should not be to create practitioners who never feel uncertain.

    Healthcare is too complex for that.

    The goal is to develop practitioners who can recognise uncertainty, think clearly about what it means and respond appropriately.

    Sometimes that means preparing more carefully.

    Sometimes it means asking a question.

    Sometimes it means escalating a concern.

    Sometimes it means accepting that you have made a reasonable decision with the information available.

    And sometimes it means recognising that anxiety itself, or the environment in which you are working needs attention.

    Professional confidence is not the absence of uncertainty.

    It is increasingly knowing what to do when uncertainty appears.

    Your Next Step

    If this article resonated with you, these resources may also help.

    FREE RESOURCE

    What to Say When You’re Unsure

    A practical free guide to framing uncertainty, asking for support and escalating concerns without feeling that you are undermining your professional credibility.

    Get the free guide →

    RELATED ARTICLE

    Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty

    If uncertainty about whether you are making the “right” decision is affecting your confidence, you may find this article useful. It explores how to make safe, proportionate decisions when complete certainty is not available.

    Read the article →

    CONTINUE YOUR DEVELOPMENT

    Professional Communication in Everyday Healthcare

    If you want to develop these skills more systematically, this self-paced CPD course explores how communication, professional judgement and confidence come together in everyday healthcare practice.

    Across approximately 10 hours of learning, you’ll work through realistic situations involving uncertainty, difficult conversations, feedback, escalation and communicating under pressure.

    10 hours CPD · Self-paced · Designed for early-career healthcare professionals

    Continue exploring early practice

    If uncertainty, confidence or the transition into professional practice are familiar themes, you may also find these useful:

    How to Ask for Help Without Feeling Incompetent →
    Learn how to organise your thinking and ask for support clearly when uncertainty means you need another person’s input.

    Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters? →
    Explore why increasing responsibility and awareness of complexity can sometimes make you feel less capable rather than more.


    About the author

    Dr Michael McCluskey is a Chartered Physiotherapist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, with experience across clinical practice, healthcare education, programme leadership, assessment and curriculum development.

    He founded Core & Oak to create evidence-informed professional development that makes the hidden expectations of healthcare practice clearer.

    Learn more about Michael and Core & Oak

    Professional education disclaimer

    This article provides general professional education. It does not provide individual clinical, employment, legal, psychological or occupational-health advice.

    Healthcare professionals should work within their scope of practice and follow the policies, escalation procedures and professional standards relevant to their role and organisation.

    Anyone experiencing significant or persistent distress should seek appropriate individual support.

    Editorial and evidence standards

    Core & Oak content is developed using the following principles:

    • content is written or reviewed by a suitably qualified professional;
    • professional and regulatory sources are prioritised where relevant;
    • research evidence is interpreted cautiously and within its limitations;
    • practical guidance is distinguished from individual clinical advice;
    • uncertainty, contextual variation and system pressures are acknowledged;
    • articles are periodically reviewed and updated;
    • commercial links are included only where the resource is relevant to the reader’s identified need.
  • How to ask for help without feeling incompetent

    How to ask for help without feeling incompetent

    It is not usually the biggest decisions that make newly qualified healthcare professionals hesitate.

    It is the smaller moments.

    The patient whose observations do not quite fit the clinical picture. The wound that looks slightly different from yesterday. The medication calculation you have checked twice but still want someone else to review.

    You rehearse the question before approaching your supervisor.

    Everyone seems busy. You do not want to interrupt. You wonder whether you should already know the answer.

    Ten minutes later, you are still worrying.

    Eventually, you ask.

    Your supervisor listens, asks two questions and says:

    “I’m glad you came to ask.”

    The conversation lasts less than a minute.

    So why did asking feel harder than the question itself?

    In Brief

    Most newly qualified healthcare professionals do not ask too many questions.

    More often, they ask them too late.

    The goal is not to avoid asking for help. The goal is to ask well.

    Experienced clinicians do not expect you to know everything.

    They expect you to recognise uncertainty, organise your thinking and seek appropriate support when it matters.

    Those are all signs of developing professional judgement.

    Why does asking for help feel so difficult?

    Many newly qualified healthcare professionals assume they are being judged on what they know.

    That is understandable.

    Only a few months ago, your knowledge was being assessed through written exams, practical assessments and placement sign-offs. It can feel as though that judgement continues after qualification.

    In reality, something begins to change.

    Experienced clinicians are rarely expecting you to know everything.

    Instead, they notice how you respond when you are uncertain.

    Can you recognise that something doesn’t feel right?

    Can you explain why you are concerned?

    Can you seek help before uncertainty becomes risk?

    These behaviours often matter more than having the perfect answer.

    This is one of healthcare’s hidden expectations.

    Many of the qualities that help practitioners become trusted are never taught explicitly, but they are noticed every day.

    For some newly qualified professionals, this can also contribute to imposter feelings particularly when increasing knowledge makes you more aware of how much complexity there is in practice.

    Asking for help is part of professional judgement

    One of the biggest misconceptions in early practice is that asking for help signals a lack of competence.

    Most experienced clinicians see it differently.

    They are usually far more concerned about delayed escalation, misplaced confidence or silence than they are about thoughtful questions.

    Knowing when to involve someone else is part of safe practice.

    In fact, recognising your own uncertainty is often one of the clearest signs that your professional judgement is developing.

    That is a very different standard from “knowing everything”.

    Professional confidence is not the same as certainty; safe practice often depends on recognising uncertainty and responding to it appropriately.

    Core & Oak infographic showing the professional judgement cycle: recognise uncertainty, organise your thinking, ask well, act safely, reflect and grow.

    A simple way to organise your thinking before asking for help

    When you need support, the ASK Framework can help you organise your thinking before approaching a colleague.

    • Assess – What do I know? What am I uncertain about? Is anyone at immediate risk?
    • Structure – Briefly explain the situation, your concern, what you have already done and the decision you need help with.
    • Know your request – Be specific about the support you need.

    Not sure what to say in the moment?

    We’ve created a free practical guide for early-career healthcare professionals, with example language for asking for support, framing uncertainty and escalating concerns clearly.

    Get the free What to Say When You’re Unsure guide →

    Rather than asking:

    “Can you help?”

    try:

    “Could you help me decide whether this patient needs reviewing now?”

    Organising a question clearly often depends on being able to explain what you have noticed, what you think it means and why you are concerned. For more on that, read How to Explain Your Clinical Reasoning Clearly as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional.

    A worked example

    A newly qualified nurse noticed that a patient’s respiratory rate was gradually increasing.

    The patient appeared well, and the observations had not triggered an emergency response. Even so, something did not feel right.

    She asked a senior nurse to review the patient.

    The patient was later diagnosed with sepsis.

    The feedback she remembered was simple:

    “You did exactly the right thing.”

    She was not praised for knowing the diagnosis.

    She was praised for recognising uncertainty and acting on it.

    Reflection

    Think about the last time you hesitated before asking for help.

    • What stopped you?
    • Were you worried about interrupting?
    • Were you worried about looking inexperienced?
    • Were you worried about being wrong?
    • Or were you trying to protect your professional identity?

    Recognising these patterns is often the first step towards changing them.

    The Core & Oak Perspective

    The safest practitioners are not the ones who ask the fewest questions.

    They are the ones who recognise when a question needs asking.

    Over time, you will still ask for help. The questions will simply become more focused, more organised and more confident.

    Healthcare has never expected you to know everything.

    It expects you to recognise uncertainty, respond appropriately and seek support when it matters.

    Your Next step

    If this article resonated with you, you might also find these resources helpful:

    FREE RESOURCE

    What to Say When You’re Unsure

    A free practical guide with example language to help you:

    • raise a concern with a senior colleague
    • ask for support without simply saying “I don’t know”
    • explain what you’ve already considered
    • escalate when something doesn’t feel right

    Get the free guide →

    RELATED ARTICLE

    Why New Healthcare Professionals Feel Like Imposters

    You can know more than you did as a student and still feel less confident. Explore why increasing responsibility and awareness of complexity can make early practice feel unexpectedly difficult.

    Read the article →

    CONTINUE YOUR DEVELOPMENT

    Professional Communication in Everyday Healthcare

    If you want to develop these skills more systematically, this self-paced CPD course explores how communication, professional judgement and confidence come together in everyday healthcare practice.

    Across approximately 10 hours of learning, you’ll work through realistic situations involving uncertainty, difficult conversations, feedback, escalation and communicating under pressure.

    10 hours CPD · Self-paced · Designed for early-career healthcare professionals

    Continue exploring early practice

    If uncertainty and confidence are familiar themes, you may also find these useful:

    Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty →
    Confidence does not mean having every answer. Explore what safe professional confidence looks like when uncertainty is part of everyday practice.

    How Much Anxiety Is Normal in a Newly Qualified Healthcare Role? →
    A practical way to think about anxiety, uncertainty and when a concern needs action.

    About the author

    Dr Michael McCluskey is a Chartered Physiotherapist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, with experience across clinical practice, healthcare education, programme leadership, assessment and curriculum development.

    He founded Core & Oak to create evidence-informed professional development that makes the hidden expectations of healthcare practice clearer.

    Learn more about Michael and Core & Oak

    Professional education disclaimer

    This article provides general professional education. It does not provide individual clinical, employment, legal, psychological or occupational-health advice.

    Healthcare professionals should work within their scope of practice and follow the policies, escalation procedures and professional standards relevant to their role and organisation.

    Anyone experiencing significant or persistent distress should seek appropriate individual support.

    Editorial and evidence standards

    Core & Oak content is developed using the following principles:

    • content is written or reviewed by a suitably qualified professional;
    • professional and regulatory sources are prioritised where relevant;
    • research evidence is interpreted cautiously and within its limitations;
    • practical guidance is distinguished from individual clinical advice;
    • uncertainty, contextual variation and system pressures are acknowledged;
    • articles are periodically reviewed and updated;
    • commercial links are included only where the resource is relevant to the reader’s identified need.
  • Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters?

    Why Do New Healthcare Professionals Often Feel Like Imposters?

    You have completed the course, passed the assessments and met the requirements for professional registration.

    Other people now introduce you as the nurse, physiotherapist, pharmacist, occupational therapist, radiographer, doctor or healthcare professional responsible for someone’s care

    Yet part of you may still be waiting for someone to discover that you do not really know what you are doing.

    You may compare yourself with experienced colleagues who appear calm and certain. You may replay small mistakes after a shift, hesitate before asking for help or worry that needing reassurance means you are not ready for the role.

    You might think:

    • Everyone else seems more confident than me.
    • I should know this by now.
    • What if someone asks me something I cannot answer?
    • What if I make a mistake and people realise I am not capable?

    These thoughts can feel deeply personal.

    In reality, they often arise from a difficult but normal professional transition.

    You are no longer a student working within an educational safety net. You are now a registered professional expected to make, communicate and justify real decisions—often before you feel fully established in the role.

    That gap between being qualified and feeling like a credible practitioner is where imposter feelings often grow.

    In brief

    Newly qualified healthcare professionals often feel like imposters because their responsibility increases faster than their confidence and experience.

    Qualification confirms that you have met the standard required to enter professional practice. It does not mean that you will immediately feel comfortable in every situation or know how to respond to every unfamiliar presentation.

    Feeling uncertain does not automatically mean that you are unsafe.

    What matters is how you recognise risk, work within your limits, communicate concerns and seek appropriate support.

    Why imposter feelings are common after qualifying

    Responsibility changes quickly

    As a student, your work usually takes place within a visible structure of supervision, assessment and educational support.

    After qualification, supervision still exists, but it often feels less obvious. You may be expected to assess, plan, act, review, document and escalate while managing a real workload.

    You are simultaneously:

    • accountable for your own actions;
    • still developing professionally;
    • learning unfamiliar systems;
    • managing the needs of real patients;
    • being observed by colleagues;
    • working out what is expected but not always stated.

    This creates a difficult tension.

    You are expected to act as an autonomous practitioner, but you do not yet have the pattern recognition, contextual knowledge or confidence that develops through repeated experience.

    It can therefore feel as though you should know more than you do.

    The reality is simpler:

    Registration confirms readiness to begin professional practice. It does not mark the end of professional development.

    Healthcare is full of uncertainty

    Education can make practice appear more predictable than it is.

    Cases have learning outcomes. Assessments have marking criteria. Simulated scenarios are designed to test particular capabilities.

    Real practice is less tidy.

    Patients may present atypically. Information may be incomplete. Guidelines may not fit the person in front of you. Different professionals may interpret the same situation differently. Staffing, time and resources may also influence what is possible.

    A newly qualified practitioner may interpret this uncertainty as personal failure:

    “I do not know exactly what to do, so I must not be competent.”

    A more experienced practitioner is likely to ask:

    “What do I know, what is the immediate risk, what information is missing and who else needs to be involved?”

    The difference is not always knowledge.

    It is often a more developed way of managing uncertainty.

    You compare your internal doubts with other people’s external performance

    You hear your own uncertainty in full detail.

    You usually see only the visible behaviour of your colleagues.

    You see a senior nurse give a clear instruction, but not the years of experience behind it. You hear a consultant summarise a case confidently, but not every possibility they considered. You watch an experienced physiotherapist adapt an assessment, but not the many previous patients who helped them recognise the pattern.

    This creates an unfair comparison:

    your developing internal reasoning against someone else’s polished external performance.

    Experienced practitioners are not necessarily certain.

    They may simply be better at identifying priorities, organising uncertainty and communicating a clear plan.

    The hidden expectations are rarely explained

    Healthcare professionals are not judged only on whether they can complete clinical tasks.

    Colleagues also form impressions based on:

    • how you communicate when uncertain;
    • whether you recognise your limits;
    • how you respond to feedback;
    • whether you escalate appropriately;
    • how reliably you follow through;
    • whether you are safe to work alongside.

    Much of this assessment is informal and unspoken.

    This is part of the hidden curriculum of healthcare practice.

    When these expectations are not made explicit, newly qualified professionals may assume that credibility means appearing knowledgeable and confident at all times.

    It does not.

    Credibility is more often built through:

    • visible judgement;
    • clear communication;
    • appropriate humility;
    • consistent professional behaviour.

    Does uncertainty mean you are not competent?

    No.

    Feeling uncertain may indicate that you recognise the complexity of the situation.

    A new practitioner can feel anxious and still behave safely. An experienced practitioner can feel confident and still make a poor decision.

    The better question is not:

    “Do I feel confident?”

    It is:

    “Am I recognising risk, using the available information, working within my limits and seeking support when I need it?”

    Confidence and competence are related, but they are not the same. Professional confidence does not require complete certainty; it develops partly through learning how to respond appropriately when certainty is unavailable.

    Professional standards do not require you to know everything. They require you to work within your scope, recognise limitations and respond responsibly when you need advice or support.

    Asking for help is therefore not evidence that you are an imposter.

    It is part of safe professional practice.

    The important skill is learning how to ask in a way that makes your concern, reasoning and need for support clear.

    What people often misunderstand

    Asking for help does not automatically reduce credibility

    New practitioners sometimes delay asking for support because they fear being judged.

    In practice, senior colleagues usually need to know:

    • what has happened;
    • what you have observed;
    • what you have already considered or done;
    • what concerns you;
    • what support or decision you need.

    There is a difference between saying:

    “I do not know what to do.”

    and saying:

    “I am concerned about this change. I have checked the available information and I would like you to review it with me.”

    The second response does not pretend certainty.

    It demonstrates that you have engaged with the situation.

    One mistake does not prove that you should never have qualified

    Mistakes, omissions and imperfect decisions occur throughout professional life.

    What matters is how you respond.

    This includes:

    • addressing any immediate risk;
    • being open about what happened
    • seeking appropriate support;
    • learning from the situation;
    • identifying whether wider systems also need to change.

    One correction, one difficult shift or one piece of critical feedback does not invalidate your qualification.

    It gives you information about what you need to develop next.

    Confidence should not be the first goal

    Trying to feel confident at all times can encourage people to hide uncertainty or avoid asking questions.

    A safer early goal is to become increasingly able to:

    • recognise what matters;
    • explain your reasoning;
    • act within your limits;
    • escalate appropriately;
    • learn from experience.

    Confidence often follows repeated evidence that you can manage difficult situations safely.

    What safe practice looks like when you lack confidence

    Safe early-career practice does not mean performing like someone with ten years of experience.

    It means behaving appropriately for your current level of competence and responsibility.

    A safe and credible newly qualified practitioner:

    • notices and responds to risk;
    • works within their scope;
    • communicates concerns clearly;
    • asks focused questions;
    • documents important decisions;
    • responds openly to feedback;
    • becomes more independent over time.

    The aim is not to remove every feeling of uncertainty.

    The aim is to become increasingly capable of managing uncertainty safely.

    At this career stage, trust matters more than brilliance.

    A practical framework: NOTICE, FRAME, ACT

    When imposter feelings arise, use three steps.

    Three-step framework for responding to imposter feelings in healthcare practice: notice what you are uncertain about, frame what you know and need, then take a proportionate next step.

    NOTICE what is happening

    Separate the feeling from the professional situation.

    Ask yourself:

    • What am I uncertain about?
    • Is there an immediate patient-safety concern?
    • Is this outside my competence, or simply unfamiliar?
    • What information do I already have?
    • What information is missing?

    Instead of thinking:

    “I have no idea what I am doing.”

    Try to identify the specific issue:

    “I am uncertain whether this change is clinically significant, and I need to review the information and discuss it with a senior colleague.”

    The second statement is more precise and easier to act upon.

    FRAME the uncertainty professionally

    Organise what you need to communicate.

    A useful structure is:

    • Situation: What is happening?
    • Evidence: What have you observed?
    • Reasoning: What do you think may be happening?
    • Risk: What concerns you?
    • Request: What support or decision do you need?

    For example:

    “Mr Ahmed’s pain has increased over the last hour and he looks more pale than earlier. His blood pressure has also fallen compared with the previous reading. I am concerned this may represent more than expected postoperative pain. I have repeated his observations and would like you to review him now.”

    This does not claim certainty.

    It demonstrates attention, reasoning, risk recognition and appropriate escalation.

    ACT at the right level

    Choose a response proportionate to the situation.

    This may involve:

    • continuing with an appropriate plan;
    • checking a policy or guideline;
    • asking a focused question;
    • requesting supervision;
    • escalating urgently;
    • documenting the decision;
    • arranging review;
    • identifying a learning need afterwards.

    Once the situation is safe, reflect briefly:

    • What did I notice correctly?
    • What information changed the decision?
    • What would I recognise earlier next time?
    • What should I revise, practise or discuss?

    The purpose is not to prove that you were inadequate.

    It is to turn experience into better future judgement.

    Want to take stock of where your confidence is actually developing?

    Imposter feelings can make it easy to focus on what still feels difficult and overlook the professional capabilities you are already building.

    Our free Early-Career Communication Confidence Checklist can help you identify what already feels more comfortable, where you still hesitate and what you might want to strengthen next..

    Get the free Communication Confidence Checklist →

    Worked example

    A newly qualified physiotherapist is assessing a patient on an acute medical ward.

    The patient has been referred for a mobility assessment before discharge. During the assessment, the patient says they feel light-headed. The physiotherapist also notices that the patient appears less alert than they did at the beginning of the session.

    The physiotherapist thinks:

    “I should know whether this is serious. An experienced physiotherapist would know what to do. Perhaps I am overreacting.”

    An unsafe response would be to minimise the concern and continue because they do not want to appear inexperienced.

    An excessively dependent response would be to ask a senior colleague to take over without first identifying or communicating the concern.

    A safe and credible response would be to:

    • stop the assessment;
    • ensure the patient is safe;
    • clarify what has changed;
    • seek the appropriate clinical review;
    • communicate the concern clearly.

    The physiotherapist might say:

    “Mr Lewis became light-headed while standing and appears less alert than at the start of the assessment. I have stopped the session and returned him safely to the chair. I am concerned about the change in his presentation and do not think it is appropriate to continue until he has been reviewed.”

    The physiotherapist does not need to diagnose the cause.

    Their responsibility is to notice the change, stop safely, communicate clearly and involve the appropriate colleague.

    That is not evidence of being an imposter.

    It is professional judgement in action.

    Reflection and application

    Think about a recent situation in which you felt less capable than other people believed you were.

    Ask yourself:

    1. What was the specific professional uncertainty?
    2. What did safe practice require from me at that moment?
    3. What evidence suggests that I am developing?

    Evidence of development may include something you noticed, a question you asked, feedback you used, a concern you escalated or a decision you explained more clearly afterwards.

    You do not need to feel like an expert to behave like a responsible professional.

    When you may need additional support

    Imposter feelings should not be used to dismiss significant distress or difficult workplace conditions.

    Seek appropriate support if anxiety or self-doubt is:

    • affecting your sleep or life outside work;
    • making it difficult to attend work;
    • interfering with concentration or decision-making;
    • linked to bullying, discrimination or an unsafe workplace;
    • becoming difficult to manage alone.

    Support may be available from a trusted supervisor, line manager, preceptorship lead, professional body, occupational health service, trade union representative or healthcare professional.

    It is also important to recognise that not every confidence problem belongs to the individual.

    Poor induction, inconsistent supervision, excessive workload, incivility and psychologically unsafe team cultures can intensify imposter feelings.

    Healthcare organisations have a responsibility to create environments where staff can ask questions, discuss mistakes and raise concerns safely.

    The Core & Oak perspective

    Healthcare rewards more than the ability to complete tasks.

    Over time, practitioners become trusted because they can:

    • think through uncertainty;
    • communicate what matters;
    • justify decisions;
    • recognise limitations;
    • reflect on experience;
    • contribute safely within a team.

    You are not expected to arrive fully formed on the day you qualify.

    You are expected to practise responsibly while continuing to develop.

    The goal is not to manufacture confidence.

    It is to develop judgement that can be made visible, communicated clearly and defended professionally.

    That is how confidence becomes grounded in practice rather than performance.

    Your next step

    Clear communication is one of the main ways healthcare professionals make their judgement visible and Core & Oak resources can help with its development.

    FREE RESOURCE

    Early-Career Communication Confidence Checklist

    A practical self-review tool to help you identify:

    • useful priorities for your ongoing professional development
    • communication situations that already feel more comfortable
    • situations where you still hesitate
    • areas you may want to strengthen

    Get the free checklist→

    RELATED ARTICLE

    How much Anxiety is Normal in a Newly Qualified Health Role

    If uncertainty and self-doubt are becoming difficult to separate from normal early-career adjustment, explore how to recognise what your concern is asking you to do.

    Read the article →

    CONTINUE YOUR DEVELOPMENT

    Professional Communication in Everyday Healthcare

    If you want to develop these skills more systematically, this self-paced CPD course explores how communication, professional judgement and confidence come together in everyday healthcare practice.

    Across approximately 10 hours of learning, you’ll work through realistic situations involving uncertainty, difficult conversations, feedback, escalation and communicating under pressure.

    10 hours CPD · Self-paced · Designed for early-career healthcare professionals

    Continue exploring early practice

    Confidence as a Newly Qualified Healthcare Professional: Safe Practice Without Certainty →

    Explore what safe professional confidence looks like when you don’t have every answer and uncertainty remains part of practice.

    How to Ask for Help Without Feeling Incompetent →

    Learn how to organise your thinking and ask for support clearly when uncertainty means you need another person’s input.


    About the author

    Dr Michael McCluskey is a Chartered Physiotherapist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, with experience across clinical practice, healthcare education, programme leadership, assessment and curriculum development.

    He founded Core & Oak to create evidence-informed professional development that makes the hidden expectations of healthcare practice clearer.

    Learn more about Michael and Core & Oak

    Professional education disclaimer

    This article provides general professional education. It does not provide individual clinical, employment, legal, psychological or occupational-health advice.

    Healthcare professionals should work within their scope of practice and follow the policies, escalation procedures and professional standards relevant to their role and organisation.

    Anyone experiencing significant or persistent distress should seek appropriate individual support.

    Editorial and evidence standards

    Core & Oak content is developed using the following principles:

    • content is written or reviewed by a suitably qualified professional;
    • professional and regulatory sources are prioritised where relevant;
    • research evidence is interpreted cautiously and within its limitations;
    • practical guidance is distinguished from individual clinical advice;
    • uncertainty, contextual variation and system pressures are acknowledged;
    • articles are periodically reviewed and updated;
    • commercial links are included only where the resource is relevant to the reader’s identified need.

    Sources and further reading

    Health and Care Professions Council. (2024) Standards of conduct, performance and ethics. Effective from 1 September 2024. London:HCPC.

    General Medical Council (2023) Good medical practice. Effective 30 Jan 2024. London: GMC. Available at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/good-medical-practice-2024. %5B12345]

    Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2018). The code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. NMC. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code/ %5B1]

    Salari N, Hashemian SH, Hosseinian-Far A, Fallahi A, Heidarian P, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of imposter syndrome in health service providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychol. 2025 May 28;13(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02898-4. PMID: 40437646; PMCID: PMC12117965.

    Chua SM, Tan IYK, Thummachai ME, et al. Impostor syndrome, associated factors and impact on well-being across medical undergraduates and postgraduate medical professionals: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2025;15:e097858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097858